. Desierto de los usuarios en el Noroeste del Pacífico: sus características, valores y preferencias de gestión. Áreas Silvestres, Noroeste Pacífico; zonas de desierto pacífico noroeste visitantes. El hacinamiento y que el área que ellos perciben como desierto se redujo considerablemente con el hacinamiento. Señala en otro documento (Lucas 1965) que "si verdaderamente hay rendimientos decrecientes en el uso creciente del desierto como los datos parecen mostrar un problema grave está por delante. Uso recreativo de racionamiento, aceptando la experiencia de inferior calidad, o ampliar el desierto serían posibles respuestas (soluciones)

• Colaborador/a: The Book Worm / Alamy Foto de stock
• ID de la imagen: RF3T81
• Tamaño: 7,2 MB (454,3 KB Descarga comprimida)
• Autorizaciones: Modelo - no | Propiedad - no
• Dimensiones: 1855 x 1348 px | 31,4 x 22,8 cm | 12,4 x 9 inches | 150dpi

Más información

Esta imagen es de dominio público, lo cual quiere decir que los derechos de autor han expirado en relación con la imagen o bien el titular ha renunciado a sus derechos de autor. Alamy le cobrará un precio por acceder a una copia de alta resolución de la imagen.

Esta imagen podría tener desperfectos porque se trata de una imagen histórica o de reportaje.

. Wilderness users in the Pacific Northwest: their characteristics, values, and management preferences. Wilderness areas Northwest, Pacific; Wilderness areas Northwest Pacific Visitors. crowding and that the area they perceived as wilderness becomes substantially reduced with crowding. He points out in another paper (Lucas 1965) that "if there are truly diminishing returns in increasing use of the wilderness as the data seem to show, a serious problem lies ahead. Rationing recreational use, accepting lower quality experience, or expanding wilderness would be possible responses (solutions) singly or in many com- binations." These are not unique observa- tions, for virtually all scientists who have studied wilderness report alarm concerning problems of overuse in spots (Frissel and Duncan 1965; Snyder 1961, 1963, 1966). The potential for increasing carrying capacity by better distribution of use is not infinite, and attempts to control distribution have largely been unsuccessful. Grazing, timber cutting, or other resource uses are not allowed without restricting them to a sustained-yield basis. Use of recreation resources should be no different. Ultimately, the use of wilderness will need to be rationed by charging fees or by other means. This reality must be faced, and wilderness managers, despite the resist- ance of many users to the idea of restricted use, must soon begin the task of educating the public to this reality of wilderness preserva- tion. Research must also bend to the task of determining physical and esthetic carrying capacities, consistent with preservation objectives, to serve as standards upon which to base rationing decisions (Wagar 1964, 1966; LaPage 1963). that lightning-caused fires, heavy infesta- tions of native insects, and heavy infesta- tions of forest diseases should be allowed to run their natural course. However, the more wildernist respondents displayed a slight tendency to oppose control of light- ning fires and a moderate ten